2015MNRAS.452..235S


Query : 2015MNRAS.452..235S

2015MNRAS.452..235S - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 452, 235-245 (2015/September-1)

Missing stellar mass in SED fitting: spatially unresolved photometry can underestimate galaxy masses.

SORBA R. and SAWICKI M.

Abstract (from CDS):

We fit model spectral energy distributions (SEDs) to each pixel in 67 nearby (<z> = 0.0057) galaxies using broad-band photometry from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and GALEX. For each galaxy, we compare the stellar mass derived by summing the mass of each pixel to that found from fitting the entire galaxy treated as an unresolved point source. We find that, while the pixel-by-pixel and unresolved masses of galaxies with low specific star formation rates (sSFRs, such as ellipticals and lenticulars) are in rough agreement, the unresolved mass estimate for star-forming galaxies is systematically lower than the measurement from spatially resolved photometry. The discrepancy is strongly correlated with sSFR, with the highest sSFRs in our sample having masses underestimated by 25 percent (0.12 dex) when treated as point sources. We found a simple relation to statistically correct mass estimates derived from unresolved broad-band SED fitting to the resolved mass estimates: mresolved = munresolved/(-0.057log(sSFR) + 0.34), where sSFR is in units of/yr. We study the effect of varying spatial resolution by degrading the image resolution of the largest images and find a sharp decrease in the pixel-by-pixel mass estimate at a physical scale of approximately 3 kpc, which is comparable to spiral arm widths. The effects we observe are consistent with the `outshining' idea which posits that the youngest stellar populations mask more massive, older - and thus fainter - stellar populations. Although the presence of strong dust lanes can also lead to a drastic difference between resolved and unresolved mass estimates (up to 45 percent or 0.3 dex) for any individual galaxy, we found that resolving dust does not affect mass estimates on average. The strong correlation between mass discrepancy and sSFR is thus most likely due to the outshining systematic bias.

Abstract Copyright: © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society (2015)

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: statistics - galaxies: stellar content

Simbad objects: 66

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 66
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 NGC 128 GiG 00 29 15.0429950112 +02 51 50.564329164   13.2       ~ 205 0
2 NGC 151 LIN 00 34 02.7914552616 -09 42 18.979473168 12.44 12.31 11.59 12.2 11.5 ~ 138 2
3 NGC 337 EmG 00 59 50.090 -07 34 40.66 11.97 12.06 11.61 12.4 12.2 ~ 279 2
4 NGC 470 GiP 01 19 44.8526263032 +03 24 36.027176544 12.63 12.53 11.78     ~ 275 1
5 M 74 G 01 36 41.7451236624 +15 47 01.107512304 10.52 10.00 9.46 9.16   ~ 1749 1
6 IC 148 GiP 01 42 26.9623614216 +13 58 37.321027788   13.44       ~ 74 1
7 NGC 777 Sy2 02 00 14.9065707744 +31 25 45.850721628 13.09 12.49 11.45     ~ 183 2
8 NGC 787 Sy1 02 00 48.6151408008 -09 00 09.216492804   13   12.21   ~ 43 1
9 NGC 881 GiG 02 18 45.2635658088 -06 38 20.643101952 13.43 13.23 12.44     ~ 50 1
10 NGC 894 Sy2 02 21 36.470 -05 31 17.02 12.21 12.26 11.73     ~ 148 2
11 NGC 991 LSB 02 35 32.6841762360 -07 09 15.862909536   12.36   12.7 12.6 ~ 156 1
12 NGC 1052 Sy2 02 41 04.79849989 -08 15 20.7519527 11.84 11.41 10.47 10.71   ~ 1308 2
13 NGC 1084 GiG 02 45 59.926 -07 34 43.10 11.22 11.59 10.73 10.55 11.1 ~ 368 2
14 NGC 2541 GiG 08 14 40.1160678912 +49 03 42.021679932 12.03 12.26 11.80     ~ 313 1
15 NGC 2552 AG? 08 19 20.5355420472 +50 00 34.590204468 13.44 13.00 12.56     ~ 266 1
16 UGC 4393 EmG 08 26 04.3889749464 +45 58 03.362401740   13.35       ~ 95 1
17 UGC 4499 GiP 08 37 41.489 +51 39 08.58   13.50       ~ 141 1
18 NGC 2693 GiG 08 56 59.2620417624 +51 20 50.738224092 13.45 12.84 11.88     ~ 127 1
19 NGC 2768 SyG 09 11 37.504 +60 02 13.95 11.30 10.84 9.87     ~ 505 2
20 NGC 2857 LIN 09 24 37.7330655312 +49 21 25.457791104   12.90 12.27     ~ 67 1
21 NGC 3023 GiP 09 49 52.636 +00 37 04.36   13.3 12.70 13.4 13.6 ~ 101 1
22 NGC 3187 GiP 10 17 47.8703571264 +21 52 23.984065272 13.71 13.91 13.44 14.06   ~ 162 1
23 NGC 3189 GiP 10 18 05.643 +21 49 54.98 12.60 12.12 11.15 11.14   ~ 401 2
24 NGC 3198 EmG 10 19 54.990 +45 32 58.88 10.83 10.87 10.33     ~ 908 1
25 M 95 GiP 10 43 57.7313485800 +11 42 13.301191332 10.71 10.51 9.73 9.48   ~ 1128 2
26 NGC 3367 Sy1 10 46 34.9528432440 +13 45 03.081157488 11.89 12.05 11.50     ~ 276 1
27 NGC 3359 EmG 10 46 36.845 +63 13 25.10 10.83 11.03 10.57     ~ 370 1
28 UGC 5889 GiP 10 47 22.4012897592 +14 04 16.697296020 14.17 14.31 13.61 13.51   ~ 142 1
29 NGC 3377 GiP 10 47 42.400 +13 59 08.30 11.55 11.24 10.38     ~ 778 1
30 NGC 3412 GiG 10 50 53.2803559464 +13 24 43.721664876 11.84 11.45 10.54     ~ 239 1
31 NGC 3489 GiG 11 00 18.5483994744 +13 54 04.206202668 11.46 11.12 10.29     ~ 403 1
32 NGC 3640 GiG 11 21 06.852 +03 14 05.15 11.89 11.36 10.44     ~ 275 3
33 NGC 3646 GiP 11 21 43.0679287224 +20 10 10.447783896 11.76 11.78 11.13     ~ 146 1
34 NGC 4116 GiP 12 07 37.156 +02 41 25.59   12.41 11.97     ~ 176 2
35 NGC 4168 Sy1 12 12 17.2692381408 +13 12 18.688208724 12.58 12.11 11.18     ~ 380 2
36 M 98 LIN 12 13 48.2910686976 +14 54 01.953475200 11.25 10.95 10.14     ~ 483 2
37 NGC 4206 AGN 12 15 16.8236744928 +13 01 26.410149444 12.81 12.82 12.15     ~ 235 1
38 NGC 4248 GiG 12 17 49.8429850848 +47 24 33.085192824   13.12 12.53     ~ 120 1
39 M 99 H2G 12 18 49.625 +14 24 59.36 10.45 10.44 9.87     ~ 925 2
40 NGC 4278 LIN 12 20 06.8242 +29 16 50.722 11.54 11.09 10.16     ~ 949 2
41 NGC 4298 GiP 12 21 32.7578814360 +14 36 22.048690716   12.04 11.34     ~ 329 1
42 NGC 4312 GiG 12 22 31.359 +15 32 16.51   12.53 11.72     ~ 171 1
43 NGC 4318 GiG 12 22 43.2906579576 +08 11 53.850831504   14.1       ~ 134 0
44 NGC 4414 GiG 12 26 27.1276893168 +31 13 24.626206488 11.12 10.96 10.12     ~ 567 2
45 NGC 4419 LIN 12 26 56.4505296720 +15 02 50.688833388 12.42 12.08 11.16     ~ 404 2
46 NGC 4421 GiG 12 27 02.5337064504 +15 27 41.371676640 12.81 12.47 11.60     ~ 115 1
47 NGC 4454 GiP 12 28 50.7436825224 -01 56 21.072272316 12.95 12.72 11.87     ~ 84 1
48 NGC 4536 GiP 12 34 27.1 +02 11 18 11.14 11.16 10.55 17.393   ~ 856 3
49 NGC 4625 GiP 12 41 52.7121819576 +41 16 26.115765780 12.74 12.92 12.35     ~ 366 2
50 NGC 4664 GiG 12 45 06.0013449504 +03 03 20.738321784   11.50 10.50     ~ 172 1
51 NGC 4691 AGN 12 48 13.60 -03 19 57.7 11.59 11.66 11.08 11.8 11.3 ~ 253 2
52 M 94 SyG 12 50 53.0737971432 +41 07 12.900884628 9.15 8.96 8.24 7.78   ~ 1393 2
53 NGC 4753 GiG 12 52 22.112 -01 11 58.88 11.26 10.85 9.95     ~ 274 1
54 UGC 8024 GiC 12 54 05.248 +27 08 58.67 14.37 14.23 13.95 13.84   ~ 594 1
55 M 64 SyG 12 56 43.696 +21 40 57.57   9.36 8.52     ~ 944 2
56 M 63 LIN 13 15 49.2741893928 +42 01 45.728076108   9.34 8.59 8.35   ~ 1226 2
57 M 101 GiP 14 03 12.583 +54 20 55.50   8.46 7.86 7.76   ~ 2929 2
58 NGC 5474 GiP 14 05 01.608 +53 39 43.95   11.28 10.79     ~ 445 1
59 NGC 5638 GiP 14 29 40.3717451400 +03 13 59.987811648 12.57 12.14 11.20     ~ 244 2
60 NGC 5705 LSB 14 39 49.691 -00 43 06.18   13.30   15.804   ~ 78 1
61 NGC 5713 GiP 14 40 11.528 -00 17 21.16 11.88 11.84 11.20     ~ 401 2
62 NGC 5719 GiP 14 40 56.3690411016 -00 19 05.854225080   13.10   12.061   ~ 174 1
63 NGC 5806 AGN 15 00 00.4088018736 +01 53 28.779594792   12.40 11.70 10.94 11.6 ~ 288 1
64 NGC 5962 GiP 15 36 31.6809457296 +16 36 27.933030504 12.04 11.98 11.34     ~ 249 1
65 UGC 10445 SBG 16 33 47.1783414768 +28 59 01.521191184   13.30 13.96     ~ 133 1
66 NGC 6255 LSB 16 54 47.963 +36 30 03.16   13.40       ~ 86 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2015MNRAS.452..235S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu