SIMBAD references

2002ApJ...577...31C - Astrophys. J., 577, 31-50 (2002/September-3)

Planetary nebulae as standard candles. XII. Connecting the population I and population II distance scales.

CIARDULLO R., FELDMEIER J.J., JACOBY G.H., KUZIO DE NARAY R., LAYCHAK M.B. and DURRELL P.R.

Abstract (from CDS):

We report the results of [O III] λ5007 surveys for planetary nebulae (PNe) in six galaxies: NGC 2403, NGC 3115, NGC 3351, NGC 3627, NGC 4258, and NGC 5866. Using on-band/off-band [O III] λ5007 images, as well as images taken in Hα, we identify samples of PNe in these galaxies and derive their distances using the planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF). We then combine these measurements with previous data to compare the PNLF, Cepheid, and surface brightness fluctuation (SBF) distance scales. We use a sample of 13 galaxies to show that the absolute magnitude of the PNLF cutoff is fainter in small, low-metallicity systems, but the trend is well modeled by the theoretical relation of Dopita, Jacoby, & Vassiliadis. When this metallicity dependence is removed, the scatter between the Cepheid and PNLF distances becomes consistent with the internal errors of the methods and independent of any obvious galaxy parameter. We then use these data to recalibrate the zero point of the PNLF distance scale. We use a sample of 28 galaxies to show that the scatter between the PNLF and SBF distance measurements agrees with that predicted from the techniques' internal errors and that there is no systematic trend between the distance residuals and stellar population. However, we also find that the PNLF and SBF methods have a significant scale offset: Cepheid-calibrated PNLF distances are, on average, ∼0.3 mag smaller than Cepheid-calibrated SBF distances. We discuss the possible causes of this offset and suggest that internal extinction in the bulges of the SBF calibration galaxies is the principal cause of the discrepancy. If this hypothesis is correct, then the SBF-based Hubble constant must be increased by ∼7%. We also use our distance to NGC 4258 to argue that the short distance scale to the LMC is correct and that the global Hubble constant inferred from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project should be increased by 8%±3% to H0=78±7 km.s–1.Mpc–1.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): Cosmology: Cosmological Parameters - Cosmology: Distance Scale - Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts - ISM: Planetary Nebulae: General

VizieR on-line data: <Available at CDS (J/ApJ/577/31): table2 table3 table4 table5 table6 table7 table8 table9 table10>

Nomenclature: Table 2: Ford M 31 NNN (Nos 570-742) added. Table 3: [CFJ2002] NGC 2403 NN (Nos 1-40). Table 4: [CFJ2002] NGC 3115 NN (Nos 1-62). Table 5: [CFJ2002] NGC 3351 NN (Nos 1-20). Table 6: [CFJ2002] NGC 3627 NN (Nos 1-73). Table 7: [CFJ2002] NGC 4258 NN (Nos 1-58). Table 8: [CFJ2002] NGC 5866 NN (Nos 1-24).

Simbad objects: 625

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2002ApJ...577...31C and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu


2022.08.08-12:03:49

© Université de Strasbourg/CNRS

    • Contact