2014ApJ...785...29S -
Astrophys. J., 785, 29 (2014/April-2)
Magnetic fields in relativistic collisionless shocks.
SANTANA R., BARNIOL DURAN R. and KUMAR P.
Abstract (from CDS):
We present a systematic study on magnetic fields in gamma-ray burst (GRB) external forward shocks (FSs). There are 60 (35) GRBs in our X-ray (optical) sample, mostly from Swift. We use two methods to study εB(fraction of energy in magnetic field in the FS): (1) for the X-ray sample, we use the constraint that the observed flux at the end of the steep decline is ≥ X-ray FS flux; (2) for the optical sample, we use the condition that the observed flux arises from the FS (optical sample light curves decline as ∼t–1, as expected for the FS). Making a reasonable assumption on E (jet isotropic equivalent kinetic energy), we converted these conditions into an upper limit (measurement) on εB n ^2/(p + 1)^ for our X-ray (optical) sample, where n is the circumburst density and p is the electron index. Taking n = 1/cm3, the distribution of εBmeasurements (upper limits) for our optical (X-ray) sample has a range of ∼10–8-10–3 (∼10–6-10–3) and median of ∼fewx10–5 (∼fewx10–5). To characterize how much amplification is needed, beyond shock compression of a seed magnetic field ∼10 µG, we expressed our results in terms of an amplification factor, AF, which is very weakly dependent on n (AF∝n 0.21). The range of AF measurements (upper limits) for our optical (X-ray) sample is ∼1-1000 (∼10-300) with a median of ∼50 (∼50). These results suggest that some amplification, in addition to shock compression, is needed to explain the afterglow observations.
Abstract Copyright:
∼
Journal keyword(s):
gamma-ray burst: general - methods: analytical - radiation mechanisms: non-thermal
Simbad objects:
113
Full paper
View the references in ADS
To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2014ApJ...785...29S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu