PS1-11ap , the SIMBAD biblio

PS1-11ap , the SIMBAD biblio (55 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2024.04.25CEST13:05:42

Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords 		in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS) 		Title First 3 Authors
2012MNRAS.422.2701P 45           X         1 4 52 Pair-instability supernovae at the epoch of reionization. PAN T., KASEN D. and LOEB A.
2013MNRAS.433.1114Y 51           X         1 7 170 Evolution and fate of very massive stars. YUSOF N., HIRSCHI R., MEYNET G., et al.
2013ApJ...778..168K 234           X C       5 8 3 A plausible (Overlooked) super-luminous supernova in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 data. KOSTRZEWA-RUTKOWSKA Z., KOZLOWSKI S., WYRZYKOWSKI L., et al.
2014MNRAS.437..656M viz 4682 T   A D S   X C       117 19 62 The superluminous supernova
PS1-11ap: bridging the gap between low and high redshift. 		McCRUM M., SMARTT S.J., KOTAK R., et al.
2013Natur.502..346N 18 6 221 Slowly fading super-luminous supernovae that are not pair-instability explosions. NICHOLL M., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2014ApJ...787..138L 412       D     X C       10 32 225 Hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae and long-duration gamma-ray bursts have similar host galaxies. LUNNAN R., CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., et al.
2014ApJ...796...87I 331       D     X         9 28 79 Superluminous supernovae as standardizable candles and high-redshift distance probes. INSERRA C. and SMARTT S.J.
2014MNRAS.444.2096N 42           X         1 17 135 Superluminous supernovae from PESSTO. NICHOLL M., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2014ApJ...797...24V viz 40           X         1 20 71 The hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova iPTF 13ajg and its host galaxy in absorption and emission. VREESWIJK P.M., SAVAGLIO S., GAL-YAM A., et al.
2015MNRAS.448.1206M viz 1207       D     X C       30 272 59 Selecting superluminous supernovae in faint galaxies from the first year of the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. McCRUM M., SMARTT S.J., REST A., et al.
2015ApJ...804...90L 17       D               3 19 56 Zooming in on the progenitors of superluminous supernovae with the HST. LUNNAN R., CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., et al.
2015MNRAS.449..917L 18       D               3 29 173 Spectroscopy of superluminous supernova host galaxies. A preference of hydrogen-poor events for extreme emission line galaxies. LELOUDAS G., SCHULZE S., KRUHLER T., et al.
2015MNRAS.449.1215P 40           X         1 25 41 DES13S2cmm: the first superluminous supernova from the Dark Energy Survey. PAPADOPOULOS A., D'ANDREA C.B., SULLIVAN M., et al.
2015ApJ...807L..18N 44           X         1 12 99 LSQ14bdq: a type IC super-luminous supernova with a double-peaked light curve. NICHOLL M., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2015MNRAS.452.1567C 732       D     X C       18 23 78 The host galaxy and late-time evolution of the superluminous supernova PTF12dam. CHEN T.-W., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2015MNRAS.452.3869N 215       D     X         6 55 156 On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor. NICHOLL M., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2016MNRAS.460.3232C 16       D               1 128 5 Physical conditions and element abundances in supernova and γ-ray burst host galaxies at different redshifts. CONTINI M.
2016A&A...593A.115J 56       D     X         2 31 11 Taking stock of superluminous supernovae and long gamma-ray burst host galaxy comparison using a complete sample of LGRBs. JAPELJ J., VERGANI S.D., SALVATERRA R., et al.
2016ApJ...831..144L 364           X C       8 14 54 PS1-14bj: a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with a long rise and slow decay. LUNNAN R., CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., et al.
2017ApJ...835L...8N 43           X         1 13 38 An ultraviolet excess in the superluminous supernova Gaia16apd reveals a powerful central engine. NICHOLL M., BERGER E., MARGUTTI R., et al.
2017ApJ...835...64G 19       D               1 91 351 An open catalog for supernova data. GUILLOCHON J., PARRENT J., KELLEY L.Z., et al.
2016A&A...596A..67R 40           X         1 60 14 SN 2012aa: A transient between Type Ibc core-collapse and superluminous supernovae. ROY R., SOLLERMAN J., SILVERMAN J.M., et al.
2017MNRAS.464.3568P 180       D       C F     4 25 46 The volumetric rate of superluminous supernovae at z ∼ 1. PRAJS S., SULLIVAN M., SMITH M., et al.
2017ApJ...840...12Y 1 38 51 A statistical study of superluminous supernovae using the magnetar engine model and implications for their connection with gamma-ray bursts and hypernovae. YU Y.-W., ZHU J.-P., LI S.-Z., et al.
2017ApJ...842...26L 341       D     X C       8 26 23 A Monte Carlo approach to magnetar-powered transients. I. Hydrogen-deficient superluminous supernovae. LIU L.-D., WANG S.-Q., WANG L.-J., et al.
2017A&A...602A...9C 42           X         1 25 37 The evolution of superluminous supernova LSQ14mo and its interacting host galaxy system. CHEN T.-W., NICHOLL M., SMARTT S.J., et al.
2017MNRAS.468.4642I 42           X         1 35 37 Complexity in the light curves and spectra of slow-evolving superluminous supernovae. INSERRA C., NICHOLL M., CHEN T.-W., et al.
2017MNRAS.469.1246K 124           X C       2 13 36 Gaia16apd - a link between fast and slowly declining type I superluminous supernovae. KANGAS T., BLAGORODNOVA N., MATTILA S., et al.
2017ApJ...845...85L viz 180       D     X         5 47 77 Analyzing the largest spectroscopic data set of hydrogen-poor super-luminous supernovae. LIU Y.-Q., MODJAZ M. and BIANCO F.B.
2017MNRAS.470.4241P 286           X C F     5 6 13 DES15E2mlf: a spectroscopically confirmed superluminous supernova that exploded 3.5 Gyr after the big bang. PAN Y.-C., FOLEY R.J., SMITH M., et al.
2017ApJ...850...55N 20       D               2 41 176 The magnetar model for Type I superluminous supernovae. I. Bayesian analysis of the full multicolor light-curve sample with MOSFiT. NICHOLL M., GUILLOCHON J. and BERGER E.
2017ApJ...851...95S 17       D               1 24 24 Magnetar-powered superluminous supernovae must first be exploded by jets. SOKER N. and GILKIS A.
2018ApJ...852...81L viz 348       D     X C       8 32 93 Hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. LUNNAN R., CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., et al.
2018MNRAS.473.1258S 100       D     X         3 75 131 Cosmic evolution and metal aversion in superluminous supernova host galaxies. SCHULZE S., KRUHLER T., LELOUDAS G., et al.
2018ApJ...853...57B 84             C       1 27 66 Gaia17biu/SN 2017egm in NGC 3191: the closest hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova to date is in a "normal," massive, metal-rich spiral galaxy. BOSE S., DONG S., PASTORELLO A., et al.
2018ApJ...854..175I 16       D               1 48 19 A statistical approach to identify superluminous supernovae and probe their diversity. INSERRA C., PRAJS S., GUTIERREZ C.P., et al.
2018A&A...611A..45R 82           X         2 47 13 Search for γ-ray emission from superluminous supernovae with the Fermi-LAT. RENAULT-TINACCI N., KOTERA K., NERONOV A., et al.
2018MNRAS.478..110S 41           X         1 16 6 Broad-band emission properties of central engine-powered supernova ejecta interacting with a circumstellar medium. SUZUKI A. and MAEDA K.
2018NatAs...2..887L 1 14 14 A UV resonance line echo from a shell around a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova. LUNNAN R., FRANSSON C., VREESWIJK P.M., et al.
2018ApJ...867..113M 16       D               2 37 11 Systematic investigation of the fallback accretion-powered model for hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. MORIYA T.J., NICHOLL M. and GUILLOCHON J.
2018ApJ...869..166V 16       D               1 58 6 Superluminous supernovae in LSST: rates, detection metrics, and light-curve modeling. VILLAR V.A., NICHOLL M. and BERGER E.
2019ApJ...874...68C 59       D     X         2 32 1 A systematic study of superluminous supernova light-curve models using clustering. CHATZOPOULOS E. and TUMINELLO R.
2019RAA....19...63W 42           X         1 28 3 The Energy Sources of Superluminous Supernovae. WANG S.-Q., WANG L.-J. and DAI Z.-G.
2020ApJ...897..114B 17       D               1 67 ~ The pre-explosion mass distribution of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova progenitors and new evidence for a mass-spin correlation. BLANCHARD P.K., BERGER E., NICHOLL M., et al.
2020ApJ...904...74G 17       D               1 145 ~ FLEET: a redshift-agnostic machine learning pipeline to rapidly identify hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. GOMEZ S., BERGER E., BLANCHARD P.K., et al.
2020A&A...643A..47O 17       D               1 93 ~ The interacting nature of dwarf galaxies hosting superluminous supernovae. ORUM S.V., IVENS D.L., STRANDBERG P., et al.
2021ApJ...909...24K 17       D               1 93 ~ Photospheric velocity gradients and ejecta masses of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae: proxies for distinguishing between fast and slow events. KONYVES-TOTH R. and VINKO J.
2021MNRAS.502.1678K 44           X         1 51 12 SN 2020ank: a bright and fast-evolving H-deficient superluminous supernova. KUMAR A., KUMAR B., PANDEY S.B., et al.
2022ApJ...931..153S 18       D               1 84 5 Constraints on the Explosion Timescale of Core-collapse Supernovae Based on Systematic Analysis of Light Curves. SAITO S., TANAKA M., SAWADA R., et al.
2022MNRAS.514.2627C 197       D     X C       4 63 5 A puzzle solved after two decades: SN 2002gh among the brightest of superluminous supernovae. CARTIER R., HAMUY M., CONTRERAS C., et al.
2022ApJ...933...14H 18       D               1 35 28 Bumpy Declining Light Curves Are Common in Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae. HOSSEINZADEH G., BERGER E., METZGER B.D., et al.
2022ApJ...937...13H 224           X C       4 4 1 Photometrically Classified Superluminous Supernovae from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey: A Case Study for Science with Machine-learning-based Classification. HSU B., HOSSEINZADEH G., VILLAR V.A., et al.
2022ApJ...941..107G 45           X         1 238 16 Luminous Supernovae: Unveiling a Population between Superluminous and Normal Core-collapse Supernovae. GOMEZ S., BERGER E., NICHOLL M., et al.
2024ApJ...961..169H 120       D     X         3 110 ~ An Extensive Hubble Space Telescope Study of the Offset and Host Light Distributions of Type I Superluminous Supernovae. HSU B., BLANCHARD P.K., BERGER E., et al.
2024A&A...683A.223S viz 570       D     X C F     10 28 ~ 1100 days in the life of the supernova 2018ibb The best pair-instability supernova candidate, to date. SCHULZE S., FRANSSON C., KOZYREVA A., et al.

goto View the references in ADS