SIMBAD references

Determining whether the flux distribution of an astrophysical source is a Gaussian or a lognormal, provides key insight into the nature of its variability. For light curves of moderate length (<10³), a useful first analysis is to test the Gaussianity of the flux and logarithm of the flux, by estimating the skewness and applying the Anderson-Darling (AD) method. We perform extensive simulations of light curves with different lengths, variability, Gaussian measurement errors, and power spectrum index β (i.e. P(f) ∝ f^–β), to provide a prescription and guidelines for reliable use of these two tests. We present empirical fits for the expected standard deviation of skewness and tabulated AD test critical values for β = 0.5 and 1.0, which differ from the values given in the literature that are for white noise (β = 0). Moreover, we show that for white noise, for most practical situations, these tests are meaningless, since binning in time alters the flux distribution. For β >= 1.5, the skewness variance does not decrease with length and hence the tests are not reliable. Thus, such tests can be applied only to systems with β >= 0.5 and β <= 1.0. As an example of the prescription given in this work, we reconfirm that the Fermi data of the blazar, 3FGL J0730.2-1141, show that its γ-ray flux is consistent with a lognormal distribution and not with a Gaussian one.