SIMBAD references

2014A&A...567A..98M - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 567A, 98-98 (2014/7-1)

Mid-infrared interferometry with K band fringe-tracking. I. The VLTI MIDI+FSU experiment.

MUELLER A., POTT J.-U., MERAND A., ABUTER R., DELPLANCKE-STROBELE F., HENNING T., KOEHLER R., LEINERT C., MOREL S., PHAN DUC T., POZNA E., RAMIREZ A., SAHLMANN J. and SCHMID C.

Abstract (from CDS):

A turbulent atmosphere causes atmospheric piston variations leading to rapid changes in the optical path difference of an interferometer, which causes correlated flux losses. This leads to decreased sensitivity and accuracy in the correlated flux measurement. To stabilize the N band interferometric signal in MIDI (MID-infrared Interferometric instrument), we use an external fringe tracker working in K band, the so-called FSU-A (fringe sensor unit) of the PRIMA (Phase-Referenced Imaging and Micro-arcsecond Astrometry) facility at VLTI. We present measurements obtained using the newly commissioned and publicly offered MIDI+FSU-A mode. A first characterization of the fringe-tracking performance and resulting gains in the N band are presented. In addition, we demonstrate the possibility of using the FSU-A to measure visibilities in the K band. We analyzed FSU-A fringe track data of 43 individual observations covering different baselines and object K band magnitudes with respect to the fringe-tracking performance. The N band group delay and phase delay values could be predicted by computing the relative change in the differential water vapor column density from FSU-A data. Visibility measurements in the K band were carried out using a scanning mode of the FSU-A. Using the FSU-A K band group delay and phase delay measurements, we were able to predict the corresponding N band values with high accuracy with residuals of less than 1µm. This allows the coherent integration of the MIDI fringes of faint or resolved N band targets, respectively. With that method we could decrease the detection limit of correlated fluxes of MIDI down to 0.5Jy (vs. 5Jy without FSU-A) and 0.05Jy (vs. 0.2Jy without FSU-A) using the ATs and UTs, respectively. The K band visibilities could be measured with a precision down to ≃2%.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): instrumentation: interferometers - techniques: interferometric - methods: observational - methods: data analysis

Simbad objects: 27

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2014A&A...567A..98M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu