SIMBAD references

2005ApJ...634..501B - Astrophys. J., 634, 501-508 (2005/November-3)

Afterglows, redshifts, and properties of Swift gamma-ray bursts.

BERGER E., KULKARNI S.R., FOX D.B., SODERBERG A.M., HARRISON F.A., NAKAR E., KELSON D.D., GLADDERS M.D., MULCHAEY J.S., OEMLER A., DRESSLER A., CENKO S.B., PRICE P.A., SCHMIDT B.P., FRAIL D.A., MORRELL N., GONZALEZ S., KRZEMINSKI W., SARI R., GAL-YAM A., MOON D.-S., PENPRASE B.E., JAYAWARDHANA R., SCHOLZ A., RICH J., PETERSON B.A., ANDERSON G., McNAUGHT R., MINEZAKI T., YOSHII Y., COWIE L.L. and PIMBBLET K.

Abstract (from CDS):

We present optical, near-IR, and radio follow-up of 16 Swift bursts, including our discovery of nine afterglows and a redshift determination for three. These observations, supplemented by data from the literature, provide an afterglow recovery rate of 52% in the optical/near-IR, much higher than in previous missions (BeppoSAX, HETE-2, INTEGRAL, and IPN). The optical/near-IR afterglows of Swift events are on average 1.8 mag fainter at t=12 hr than those of previous missions. The X-ray afterglows are similarly fainter than those of pre-Swift bursts. In the radio the limiting factor is the VLA threshold, and the detection rate for Swift bursts is similar to that for past missions. The redshift distribution of pre-Swift bursts peaked at z∼1, whereas the six Swift bursts with measured redshifts are distributed evenly between 0.7 and 3.2. From these results we conclude that (1) the pre-Swift distributions were biased in favor of bright events and low-redshift events, (2) the higher sensitivity and accurate positions of Swift result in a better representation of the true burst redshift and brightness distributions (which are higher and dimmer, respectively), and (3) ∼10% of the bursts are optically dark, as a result of a high redshift and/or dust extinction. We remark that the apparent lack of low-redshift, low-luminosity Swift bursts and the lower event rate than prelaunch estimates (90 vs. 150 per year) are the result of a threshold that is similar to that of BATSE. In view of these inferences, afterglow observers may find it advisable to make significant changes in follow-up strategies of Swift events. The faintness of the afterglows means that large telescopes should be employed as soon as the burst is localized. Sensitive observations in RIz and near-IR bands will be needed to discriminate between a typical z∼2 burst with modest extinction and a high-redshift event. Radio observations will be profitable for a small fraction (∼10%) of events. Finally, we suggest that a search for bright host galaxies in untriggered BAT localizations may increase the chance of finding nearby low-luminosity GRBs.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): Gamma Rays: Bursts

Nomenclature: Fig.1: [BKF2005] GRB 050315 abs N.NNNN N=1. Fig.2: [BKF2005] GRB 050318 abs N.NNNN N=2. Fig.3: [BKF2005] GRB 050408 abs N.NNNN N=1.

Simbad objects: 24

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2005ApJ...634..501B and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu


2022.08.08-01:13:33

© Université de Strasbourg/CNRS

    • Contact