1995A&A...298...87G


Query : 1995A&A...298...87G

1995A&A...298...87G - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 298, 87-106 (1995/6-1)

Age distribution of LMC clusters from their integrated UBV colors: history of star formation.

GIRARDI L., CHIOSI C., BERTELLI G. and BRESSAN A.

Abstract (from CDS):

In this paper we revise the relationship between ages and metallicities of LMC star clusters and their integrated UBV colors. The study stands on the catalog of UBV colors of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) clusters by Bica et al. (1996ApJS..102...57B; BCDSP) and the photometric models of single stellar populations (SSP) calculated by Bertelli et al. (1994A&AS..106..275B). These photometric models nicely describe the color distribution of LMC clusters in the (U-B) vs. (B-V) plane together with the observed dispersion of the colors and the existence of a gap in a certain region of this diagram. In the case of blue clusters, most of the dispersion in the colors can be accounted for by the presence of stochastic effects on the mass distribution of stars, whereas for the red ones additional dispersion's of ∼0.2dex in metallicity and of ∼0.05mag in color excess are needed. From comparing the observed distribution of integrated colors in the (U-B) vs. (B-V) diagram with the theoretical models, it turns out that: 1) The data are consistent with the presence of a gap (period of quiescence) in the history of cluster formation. If the age-metallicity relation (AMR) for the LMC obeys the simple model of chemical evolution, the gap is well evident and corresponds to the age interval ∼3Gyr to (12-15)Gyr. On the contrary, if the chemical enrichment has been much slower than in the simple model, so that intermediate age clusters are less metal rich, the gap is expected to occur over a much narrower color range and to be hidden by effects of color dispersion. 2) The bimodal distribution of B-V colors can be reproduced by a sequence of clusters almost evenly distributed in the logarithm of the age, whose metallicity is governed by a normal AMR. No need is found of the so-called phase transitions in the integrated colors of a cluster taking place at suitable ages (Renzini & Buzzoni 1986 in Spectral Evolution of Galaxies, p. 195). 3) The gap noticed by BCDSP in the (U-B) vs. (B-V) plane can be explained by the particular direction along which cluster colors are dispersed in that part of the (U-B) vs. (B-V) diagram. Also in this case, no sudden changes in the integrated properties of clusters must be invoked. The results of this analysis are used to revise the empirical method proposed by Elson & Fall (1985ApJ...299..211E, EF85) to attribute ages to LMC clusters according to their integrated UBV colors. We show that the EF85 method does not provide the correct relation between ages and colors for clusters of low metallicity and hence its inability to date the old clusters. We propose two modifications to the definition of the parameter S of EF85 such that the age sequence of red clusters is suitably described, and the intrinsic errors on ages caused by the heavy presence of various effects dispersing the colors are reduced to a minimum. The age sequence is calibrated on 24 template clusters for which ages were independently derived from recent color-magnitude diagrams (CMD). Finally, we attribute ages to all clusters present in BCDSP catalog, and derive the global age distribution function (ADF) for LMC clusters. The ADF presents new features that were not clear in previous analyses of UBV data, but were already suggested by a number of independent observational studies. The features in question are periods of enhanced cluster formation at ∼100Myr and 1-2Gyr, and a gap in the cluster formation history between ∼3 and (12-15)Gyr. The peaks observed in the distribution of B-V colors are found to be sensitive to the presence of these periods of enhanced cluster formation and the lack of extremely red clusters caused by the age gap between intermediate-age and old clusters.

Abstract Copyright:

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: Magellanic Clouds - galaxies: star clusters - stars: evolution - stars: HR diagram - Galaxy: globular clusters: general

Simbad objects: 42

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 42
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2024
#notes
1 NGC 104 GlC 00 24 05.359 -72 04 53.20     4.09     ~ 3917 0
2 NGC 288 GlC 00 52 45.24 -26 34 57.4   10 8.13     ~ 1042 0
3 NGC 1466 GlC 03 44 32.71 -71 40 18.0   11.6 11.59     ~ 162 0
4 NGC 1644 GlC 04 37 39 -66 12.0   13.52 12.89     ~ 38 0
5 NGC 1841 GlC 04 45 24.38 -83 59 53.3   12.23 11.43     ~ 182 0
6 NGC 1711 Cl* 04 50 37.320 -69 59 01.72   11.22 11.10     ~ 113 0
7 ESO 32-20 Cl* 04 50 45 -75 32.0   14.58 13.99     ~ 27 0
8 NGC 1756 GlC 04 54 49.130 -69 14 10.20   12.64 12.24     ~ 30 0
9 NGC 1786 Cl* 04 59 07.470 -67 44 45.44   10.1       ~ 146 0
10 NGC 1783 GlC 04 59 08.590 -65 59 15.84   10.9 10.93     ~ 253 0
11 NGC 1806 GlC 05 02 11.180 -67 59 05.89   11.1       ~ 157 0
12 NGC 1831 GlC 05 06 16.12 -64 55 06.9   11.52 11.18     ~ 164 0
13 NGC 1850 Cl* 05 08 50.190 -68 45 35.65   8.84 8.96     ~ 273 1
14 OGLE-CL LMC 167 Cl* 05 09 55.550 -69 21 16.15   13.40 12.95     ~ 18 0
15 NGC 1858 Cl* 05 09 56.09 -68 54 06.2   9.76 9.88     ~ 83 3
16 NGC 1861 Cl* 05 10 22.110 -70 46 43.22   13.63 13.16     ~ 18 0
17 NGC 1866 GlC 05 13 38.920 -65 27 52.75           ~ 421 0
18 NGC 1851 GlC 05 14 06.76 -40 02 47.6           ~ 1430 0
19 NGC 1868 GlC 05 14 36.60 -63 57 25.7   12.02 11.57     ~ 121 0
20 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 17437 0
21 M 79 GlC 05 24 10.59 -24 31 27.3     8.16     ~ 817 0
22 NGC 1987 GlC 05 27 16.940 -70 44 14.16   12.1       ~ 92 0
23 NGC 2010 Cl* 05 30 34.230 -70 49 08.23   11.96 11.72     ~ 39 0
24 NGC 2004 Cl* 05 30 41.340 -67 17 21.83   9.6       ~ 275 0
25 NGC 2100 Cl* 05 42 07.200 -69 12 26.99   9.6       ~ 189 0
26 NGC 2107 Cl* 05 43 12.270 -70 38 26.83   11.89 11.51     ~ 49 0
27 NGC 2108 GlC 05 43 56.270 -69 10 54.37   12.90 12.32     ~ 67 0
28 NGC 2134 Cl* 05 51 55.950 -71 05 53.57   11.05       ~ 72 0
29 NGC 2154 Cl* 05 57 38 -67 15.7   12.47 11.79     ~ 60 0
30 NGC 2173 GlC 05 57 58 -72 58.7   12.74 11.88     ~ 141 0
31 NGC 2164 OpC 05 58 55.900 -68 30 58.09   10.44 10.34     ~ 123 0
32 NGC 2162 GlC 06 00 30.21 -63 43 18.2   13.38 12.70     ~ 78 0
33 NGC 2190 GlC 06 01 02 -74 43.6   13.57 12.94     ~ 42 0
34 ESO 121-3 Cl* 06 02 03.32 -60 31 25.6   14.91 14.04     ~ 114 0
35 NGC 2209 GlC 06 08 36.06 -73 50 07.9   13.58 13.15     ~ 114 0
36 NGC 2210 GlC 06 11 31.296 -69 07 17.04   10.9 10.94     ~ 187 0
37 NGC 2214 OpC 06 12 57 -68 15.6   11.04 10.93     ~ 119 0
38 NAME Hodge 11 GlC 06 14 22.92 -69 50 54.9   12.57 11.93     ~ 110 0
39 NGC 2249 GlC 06 25 49 -68 55.2   12.66 12.23     ~ 72 0
40 NGC 2257 Cl* 06 30 12.62 -64 19 40.0   13.24 12.62     ~ 216 0
41 M 92 GlC 17 17 07.39 +43 08 09.4     6.52     ~ 2116 0
42 M 30 GlC 21 40 22.12 -23 10 47.5     7.10     ~ 1049 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 1995A&A...298...87G and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu