SN 2011kg , the SIMBAD biblio

SN 2011kg , the SIMBAD biblio (69 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2024.04.23CEST22:11:34

Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords 		in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS) 		Title First 3 Authors
2013ApJ...763...42O viz 94       D       C       2 43 52 X-ray emission from supernovae in dense circumstellar matter environments: a search for collisionless shocks. OFEK E.O., FOX D., CENKO S.B., et al.
2013ApJ...770..128I 2308   K A D S   X C       58 23 332 Super-luminous type IC supernovae: catching a magnetar by the tail. INSERRA C., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2013ApJ...771..136L 94       D       C       2 23 37 Superluminous x-rays from a superluminous supernova. LEVAN A.J., READ A.M., METZGER B.D., et al.
2014ApJ...780...44C 162           X C       3 17 183 The ultraviolet-bright, slowly declining transient PS1-11af as a partial tidal disruption event. CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., GEZARI S., et al.
2014MNRAS.437..656M viz 40           X         1 19 62 The superluminous supernova PS1-11ap: bridging the gap between low and high redshift. McCRUM M., SMARTT S.J., KOTAK R., et al.
2014ApJ...787..138L 451       D     X C       11 32 225 Hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae and long-duration gamma-ray bursts have similar host galaxies. LUNNAN R., CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., et al.
2011ATel.3841....1Q 156 T         X         3 2 8 Discovery of a luminous supernova, PTF 11rks. QUIMBY R.M., GAL-YAM A., ARCAVI I., et al.
2014ApJ...796...87I 489       D S   X         12 28 79 Superluminous supernovae as standardizable candles and high-redshift distance probes. INSERRA C. and SMARTT S.J.
2014MNRAS.444.2096N 42           X         1 17 135 Superluminous supernovae from PESSTO. NICHOLL M., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2015ApJ...799..107W 80           X         2 15 47 Superluminous supernovae powered by magnetars: late-time light curves and hard emission leakage. WANG S.Q., WANG L.J., DAI Z.G., et al.
2015MNRAS.448.1206M viz 79             C       1 272 59 Selecting superluminous supernovae in faint galaxies from the first year of the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. McCRUM M., SMARTT S.J., REST A., et al.
2015AJ....149..165W 16       D               1 11 15 Testing cosmological models with Type IC super luminous supernovae. WEI J.-J., WU X.-F. and MELIA F.
2015ApJ...804...90L 41           X         1 19 56 Zooming in on the progenitors of superluminous supernovae with the HST. LUNNAN R., CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., et al.
2015MNRAS.449.1215P 79           X         2 25 41 DES13S2cmm: the first superluminous supernova from the Dark Energy Survey. PAPADOPOULOS A., D'ANDREA C.B., SULLIVAN M., et al.
2015Natur.523..189G 14 8 225 A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst. GREINER J., MAZZALI P.A., KANN A., et al.
2015MNRAS.452.3869N 96       D       C       3 55 156 On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor. NICHOLL M., SMARTT S.J., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2016MNRAS.458...84A viz 297       D     X C       7 127 46 A Hubble Space Telescope survey of the host galaxies of Superluminous Supernovae. ANGUS C.R., LEVAN A.J., PERLEY D.A., et al.
2016MNRAS.460L..55M 16       D               1 23 10 Constraining the ellipticity of strongly magnetized neutron stars powering superluminous supernovae. MORIYA T.J. and TAURIS T.M.
2016A&A...593A.115J 16       D               1 31 11 Taking stock of superluminous supernovae and long gamma-ray burst host galaxy comparison using a complete sample of LGRBs. JAPELJ J., VERGANI S.D., SALVATERRA R., et al.
2016ApJ...830...13P viz 702       D S   X C       16 42 174 Host-galaxy properties of 32 low-redshift superluminous supernovae from the Palomar transient factory. PERLEY D.A., QUIMBY R.M., YAN L., et al.
2016ApJ...832...73C 128           X C       2 5 41 Magnetar-powered supernovae in two dimensions. I. Superluminous supernovae. CHEN K.-J., WOOSLEY S.E. and SUKHBOLD T.
2016ApJ...833..110I 82             C       1 13 29 Are ultra-long gamma-ray bursts caused by blue supergiant collapsars, newborn magnetars, or white dwarf tidal disruption events? IOKA K., HOTOKEZAKA K. and PIRAN T.
2016A&A...596A..67R 201           X C       4 60 14 SN 2012aa: A transient between Type Ibc core-collapse and superluminous supernovae. ROY R., SOLLERMAN J., SILVERMAN J.M., et al.
2017MNRAS.464.3568P 17       D               1 25 46 The volumetric rate of superluminous supernovae at z ∼ 1. PRAJS S., SULLIVAN M., SMITH M., et al.
2017ApJ...840...12Y 17       D               3 38 51 A statistical study of superluminous supernovae using the magnetar engine model and implications for their connection with gamma-ray bursts and hypernovae. YU Y.-W., ZHU J.-P., LI S.-Z., et al.
2017ApJ...842...26L 301       D     X C       7 26 23 A Monte Carlo approach to magnetar-powered transients. I. Hydrogen-deficient superluminous supernovae. LIU L.-D., WANG S.-Q., WANG L.-J., et al.
2017MNRAS.469.1246K 43           X         1 13 36 Gaia16apd - a link between fast and slowly declining type I superluminous supernovae. KANGAS T., BLAGORODNOVA N., MATTILA S., et al.
2017ApJ...845...85L viz 180       D     X         5 47 77 Analyzing the largest spectroscopic data set of hydrogen-poor super-luminous supernovae. LIU Y.-Q., MODJAZ M. and BIANCO F.B.
2017MNRAS.470.3566C 99       D         F     9 22 54 Superluminous supernova progenitors have a half-solar metallicity threshold. CHEN T.-W., SMARTT S.J., YATES R.M., et al.
2017ApJ...848....6Y 44           X         1 23 91 Hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae with late-time Hα emission: three events from the intermediate Palomar Transient Factory. YAN L., LUNNAN R., PERLEY D.A., et al.
2017ApJ...850...55N 101       D     X         3 41 176 The magnetar model for Type I superluminous supernovae. I. Bayesian analysis of the full multicolor light-curve sample with MOSFiT. NICHOLL M., GUILLOCHON J. and BERGER E.
2017ApJ...850..148W 244           X C       5 11 6 Modeling the most luminous supernova associated with a gamma-ray burst, SN 2011kl. WANG S.-Q., CANO Z., WANG L.-J., et al.
2017ApJ...851...54W 41           X         1 21 10 A Monte Carlo approach to magnetar-powered transients. II. Broad-lined Type Ic supernovae not associated with GRBs. WANG L.J., CANO Z., WANG S.Q., et al.
2017ApJ...851..107W viz 123           X         3 26 30 IPTF 16asu: a luminous, rapidly evolving, and high-velocity supernova. WHITESIDES L., LUNNAN R., KASLIWAL M.M., et al.
2018MNRAS.473.1258S 141       D     X         4 75 131 Cosmic evolution and metal aversion in superluminous supernova host galaxies. SCHULZE S., KRUHLER T., LELOUDAS G., et al.
2018ApJ...853...57B 84             C       1 27 66 Gaia17biu/SN 2017egm in NGC 3191: the closest hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova to date is in a "normal," massive, metal-rich spiral galaxy. BOSE S., DONG S., PASTORELLO A., et al.
2018ApJ...854...37S 41           X         1 13 12 Studying the ultraviolet spectrum of the first spectroscopically confirmed Supernova at redshift two. SMITH M., SULLIVAN M., NICHOL R.C., et al.
2018ApJ...854..175I 16       D               1 48 19 A statistical approach to identify superluminous supernovae and probe their diversity. INSERRA C., PRAJS S., GUTIERREZ C.P., et al.
2018ApJ...855....2Q 1046       D     X C       25 63 93 Spectra of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory. QUIMBY R.M., DE CIA A., GAL-YAM A., et al.
2018ApJ...857...72H 181       D     X C       4 12 5 Obscured star formation in the host galaxies of superluminous supernovae. HATSUKADE B., TOMINAGA N., HAYASHI M., et al.
2018A&A...611A..45R 82           X         2 47 13 Search for γ-ray emission from superluminous supernovae with the Fermi-LAT. RENAULT-TINACCI N., KOTERA K., NERONOV A., et al.
2018ApJ...858...91Y 83           X         2 9 10 Far-UV HST spectroscopy of an unusual hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova: SN2017egm. YAN L., PERLEY D.A., DE CIA A., et al.
2018ApJ...860..100D viz 430       D     X         11 41 119 Light curves of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory. DE CIA A., GAL-YAM A., RUBIN A., et al.
2018ApJ...864...45M viz 182       D     X         5 37 58 Results from a systematic survey of X-ray emission from hydrogen-poor superluminous SNe. MARGUTTI R., CHORNOCK R., METZGER B.D., et al.
2018ApJ...867..113M 16       D               2 37 11 Systematic investigation of the fallback accretion-powered model for hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. MORIYA T.J., NICHOLL M. and GUILLOCHON J.
2018ApJ...869..166V 16       D               1 58 6 Superluminous supernovae in LSST: rates, detection metrics, and light-curve modeling. VILLAR V.A., NICHOLL M. and BERGER E.
2019ApJ...872...90B 251           X C       5 18 4 A hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with enhanced iron-group absorption: a new link between SLSNe and broad-lined Type Ic SNe. BLANCHARD P.K., NICHOLL M., BERGER E., et al.
2019PASP..131a5002G 84             C       1 43 ~ The benefit of simultaneous seven-filter imaging: 10 years of GROND observations. GREINER J.
2019ApJ...874...68C 17       D               1 32 1 A systematic study of superluminous supernova light-curve models using clustering. CHATZOPOULOS E. and TUMINELLO R.
2020ApJ...897..114B 17       D               1 67 ~ The pre-explosion mass distribution of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova progenitors and new evidence for a mass-spin correlation. BLANCHARD P.K., BERGER E., NICHOLL M., et al.
2020ApJ...902L...8Y viz 44           X         1 13 17 Helium-rich superluminous supernovae from the Zwicky Transient Facility. YAN L., PERLEY D.A., SCHULZE S., et al.
2020ApJ...904...74G 17       D               1 145 ~ FLEET: a redshift-agnostic machine learning pipeline to rapidly identify hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. GOMEZ S., BERGER E., BLANCHARD P.K., et al.
2020A&A...643A..47O 17       D               1 93 ~ The interacting nature of dwarf galaxies hosting superluminous supernovae. ORUM S.V., IVENS D.L., STRANDBERG P., et al.
2021MNRAS.500.5142F 17       D               3 113 29 From core collapse to superluminous: the rates of massive stellar explosions from the Palomar Transient Factory. FROHMAIER C., ANGUS C.R., VINCENZI M., et al.
2021ApJ...909...24K 17       D               2 93 ~ Photospheric velocity gradients and ejecta masses of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae: proxies for distinguishing between fast and slow events. KONYVES-TOTH R. and VINKO J.
2021MNRAS.502.1678K 131           X         3 51 12 SN 2020ank: a bright and fast-evolving H-deficient superluminous supernova. KUMAR A., KUMAR B., PANDEY S.B., et al.
2021MNRAS.502.2120F 174           X C       3 23 16 SN 2017gci: a nearby Type I Superluminous Supernova with a bumpy tail. FIORE A., CHEN T.-W., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2021ApJ...912...21E 409       D S   X         9 125 18 Late-time radio and millimeter observations of superluminous supernovae and long gamma-ray bursts: implications for central engines, fast radio bursts, and obscured star formation. EFTEKHARI T., MARGALIT B., OMAND C.M.B., et al.
2021MNRAS.504.2535I 17       D               1 31 24 The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae. INSERRA C., SULLIVAN M., ANGUS C.R., et al.
2021ApJS..255...29S viz 17       D               1 893 63 The Palomar Transient Factory core-collapse supernova host-galaxy sample. I. Host-galaxy distribution functions and environment dependence of core-collapse supernovae. SCHULZE S., YARON O., SOLLERMAN J., et al.
2021ApJ...922...17H 44           X         1 40 2 A VLA survey of late-time radio emission from superluminous supernovae and the host galaxies. HATSUKADE B., TOMINAGA N., MOROKUMA T., et al.
2022ApJ...928..114W 46           X         1 6 7 iPTF 16asu Revisited: A Rapidly Evolving Superluminous Broad-lined Ic Supernova?. WANG S.-Q. and GAN W.-P.
2022ApJ...931..153S 63       D     X         2 84 5 Constraints on the Explosion Timescale of Core-collapse Supernovae Based on Systematic Analysis of Light Curves. SAITO S., TANAKA M., SAWADA R., et al.
2022ApJ...940...69K 197       D     X         5 32 2 Premaximum Spectroscopic Diversity of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae. KONYVES-TOTH R.
2022ApJ...941..107G 45           X         1 238 16 Luminous Supernovae: Unveiling a Population between Superluminous and Normal Core-collapse Supernovae. GOMEZ S., BERGER E., NICHOLL M., et al.
2023ApJ...943...41C 19       D               4 71 17 The Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Zwicky Transient Facility Phase I Survey. I. Light Curves and Measurements. CHEN Z.H., YAN L., KANGAS T., et al.
2023ApJ...954...44K 65       D     X         2 29 ~ Type W and Type 15bn Subgroups of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae: Premaximum Diversity, Postmaximum Homogeneity? KONYVES-TOTH R. and SELI B.
2023MNRAS.526.1822K 112       D         F     2 31 ~ Reduction of supernova light curves by vector Gaussian processes. KORNILOV M.V., SEMENIKHIN T.A. and PRUZHINSKAYA M.V.
2024ApJ...961..169H 20       D               1 110 ~ An Extensive Hubble Space Telescope Study of the Offset and Host Light Distributions of Type I Superluminous Supernovae. HSU B., BLANCHARD P.K., BERGER E., et al.

goto View the references in ADS