CDS

NAME Sloan Great Wall , the SIMBAD biblio

NAME Sloan Great Wall , the SIMBAD biblio (172 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2023.03.27CEST11:53:55

Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords 		in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS) 		Title First 3 Authors
2004MNRAS.354..332S 1 3 14 Morphology of mock SDSS catalogues. SHETH J.V.
2005A&A...443...11J 6 3 40 Basic properties of galaxy clustering in the light of recent results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. JOYCE M., SYLOS LABINI F., GABRIELLI A., et al.
2005ApJ...624..463G 1 64 199 A map of the Universe. GOTT III J.R., JURIC M., SCHLEGEL D., et al.
2006MNRAS.368.1507N 367     A     X C       9 3 47 The effect of large-scale structure on the SDSS galaxy three-point correlation function. NICHOL R.C., SHETH R.K., SUTO Y., et al.
2006MNRAS.371..915D 19 4 Statistical characteristics of the observed Lyα forest and the shape of the initial power spectrum. DEMIANSKI M., DOROSHKEVICH A.G. and TURCHANINOV V.I.
2006PASP..118..947T 37           X         1 210 4 Astrophysics in 2005. TRIMBLE V., ASCHWANDEN M.J. and HANSEN C.J.
2006ChJAA...6...35D 2 3 15 Super-large-scale structures in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. DENG X.-F., CHEN Y.-Q., ZHANG Q., et al.
2006A&A...459L...1E viz 40           X         1 6 43 Luminous superclusters: remnants from inflation? EINASTO J., EINASTO M., SAAR E., et al.
2007A&A...462..397E 75           X         2 70 49 Superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF redshift survey. II. Comparison with simulations. EINASTO J., EINASTO M., SAAR E., et al.
2007A&A...462..811E viz 44           X         1 5 63 Superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF redshift survey. I. The catalogue. EINASTO J., EINASTO M., TAGO E., et al.
2007MNRAS.375..337C 82           X         2 2 29 Quantifying cosmic superstructures. COLBERG J.M.
2007ApJ...658..884C 93           X         1 1 110 Internal and collective properties of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. CHOI Y.-Y., PARK C. and VOGELEY M.S.
2007MNRAS.378.1196K 68           X         1 1 61 The three-point correlation function of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. KULKARNI G.V., NICHOL R.C., SHETH R.K., et al.
2006CoKon.104..163E 1 4 10 Formation of the supercluster-void network. EINASTO J.
2007ApJ...669..692Q 38           X         1 4 0 The neighborhood function and its application to identifying large-scale structure in the comoving universe frame. QIN Y.-P., LU L.-Z., ZHANG F.-W., et al.
2007A&A...476..697E 152     A D S   X C       3 12 28 The richest superclusters. I. Morphology. EINASTO M., SAAR E., LIIVAMAEGI L.J., et al.
2008A&A...477..381S 46           X         1 1 16 Extension and estimation of correlations in cold dark matter models. SYLOS LABINI F. and VASILYEV N.L.
2008ApJ...672L...1S 5 3 33 The three-dimensional skeleton of the SDSS. SOUSBIE T., PICHON C., COURTOIS H., et al.
2008ApJ...674L..13C 119           X C       2 1 11 The environment of galaxies at low redshift. COWAN N.B. and IVEZIC Z.
2008AN....329...69D 2 2 8 The clustering properties of luminous ref galaxies. DENG X.F., ZOU S.Y., JIANG P., et al.
2008ApJ...675...16G 709     A     X C       18 4 37 Genus topology of structure in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: model testing. GOTT III J.R., HAMBRICK D.C., VOGELEY M.S., et al.
2008ApJ...683..123K 47           X         1 1 18 A subhalo-galaxy correspondence model of galaxy biasing. KIM J., PARK C. and CHOI Y.-Y.
2008ApJ...685...83E 99     A     X         3 32 24 Toward understanding rich superclusters. EINASTO M., SAAR E., MARTINEZ V.J., et al.
2008ApJ...686...53T 222           X C       4 1 66 Void statistics in large galaxy redshift surveys: does halo occupation of field galaxies depend on environment? TINKER J.L., CONROY C., NORBERG P., et al.
2009PASP..121..231D 154           X         4 3 7 Dependence of clustering on galaxy color for the volume-limited main galaxy sample of the SDSS6. DENG X.-F., HE J.-Z., HU P., et al.
2009ApJ...698.1838H 43           X         1 1 11 Spatial clustering from GALEX-SDSS samples: star formation history and large-scale clustering. HEINIS S., BUDAVARI T., SZALAY A.S., et al.
2009MNRAS.397.1243Z 64           X         1 1 52 Estimating the hi gas fractions of galaxies in the local universe. ZHANG W., LI C., KAUFFMANN G., et al.
2009ApJ...703.2217S viz 92           X         1 1 108 Cross-correlation weak lensing of SDSS galaxy clusters. I. Measurements. SHELDON E.S., JOHNSTON D.E., SCRANTON R., et al.
2009ApJ...706..436D 41           X         1 1 7 Comparative studies of clustering properties between passive galaxies and star-forming ones. DENG X.-F., HE J.-Z., CHEN Y.-Q., et al.
2009MNRAS.397..868S 42           X         1 3 28 Luminosity and surface brightness distribution of k-band galaxies from the UKIDSS large area survey. SMITH A.J., LOVEDAY J. and CROSS N.J.G.
2009MNRAS.400..183K 382           X C F     8 18 40 Cosmic cartography of the large-scale structure with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6. KITAURA F.S., JASCHE J., LI C., et al.
2009A&A...507.1225A 214     A     X         6 15 25 Very deep spectroscopy of the Coma cluster line of sight: exploring new territories. ADAMI C., LE BRUN V., BIVIANO A., et al.
2009A&A...508...17S 433       S   X C       9 1 26 Breaking the self-averaging properties of spatial galaxy fluctuations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - Data release six. SYLOS LABINI F., VASILYEV N.L. and BARYSHEV Y.V.
2010ApJS..186...94K 78           X         2 10 25 An extremely deep, wide-field near-infrared survey: bright galaxy counts and local large scale structure. KEENAN R.C., TROUILLE L., BARGER A.J., et al.
2010MNRAS.404..486H 19 1 39 Abundances, masses and weak-lensing mass profiles of galaxy clusters as a function of richness and luminosity in {LAMBDA}CDM cosmologies. HILBERT S. and WHITE S.D.M.
2010A&A...514A.102T viz 80           X         2 9 70 Groups of galaxies in the SDSS Data Release 7. Flux- and volume-limited samples. TAGO E., SAAR E., TEMPEL E., et al.
2010MNRAS.406.1609B 57           X         1 1 38 Crawling the cosmic network: exploring the morphology of structure in the galaxy distribution. BOND N.A., STRAUSS M.A. and CEN R.
2010ApJS..190..181C 196           X C       4 4 34 Galaxy clustering topology in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey main galaxy sample: a test for galaxy formation models. CHOI Y.-Y., PARK C., KIM J., et al.
2010MNRAS.408.2163A 105           X         2 2 113 Multiscale phenomenology of the cosmic web. ARAGON-CALVO M.A., VAN DE WEYGAERT R. and JONES B.J.T.
2011ApJ...726...13M 484           X C       11 1 40 Three-point correlation functions of SDSS galaxies: luminosity and color dependence in redshift and projected space. McBRIDE C.K., CONNOLLY A.J., GARDNER J.P., et al.
2011ApJ...728...34T 243           X C       5 1 23 Redshift-space enhancement of line-of-sight baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey main-galaxy sample. TIAN H.J., NEYRINCK M.C., BUDAVARI T., et al.
2010A&A...522A..92E 1229 T   A D S   X C       30 21 26 The Sloan Great Wall. Rich clusters. EINASTO M., TAGO E., SAAR E., et al.
2011A&A...529A..53T 45           X         1 5 61 Galaxy morphology, luminosity, and environment in the SDSS DR7. TEMPEL E., SAAR E., LIIVAMAEGI L.J., et al.
2011MNRAS.412.2498M viz 39           X         1 412 113 Galaxy groups and clouds in the local (z∼ 0.01) universe. MAKAROV D. and KARACHENTSEV I.
2011MNRAS.413..971D viz 39           X         1 41769 592 Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release. DRIVER S.P., HILL D.T., KELVIN L.S., et al.
2011MNRAS.413.1311Y 41           X         1 4 17 Are the superstructures in the two-degree field galaxy redshift survey a problem for hierarchical models? YARYURA C.Y., BAUGH C.M. and ANGULO R.E.
2011MNRAS.410.1837P viz 990 T   A S   X C F     22 310 6 The architecture of Abell 1386 and its relationship to the Sloan great wall. PIMBBLET K.A., ANDERNACH H., FISHLOCK C.K., et al.
2011MNRAS.413.2288M 79           X         2 4 23 Connected structure in the two-degree field galaxy redshift survey. MURPHY D.N.A., EKE V.R. and FRENK C.S.
2011MNRAS.414.2436C 47           X         1 1 17 Extreme value statistics of smooth gaussian random fields. COLOMBI S., DAVIS O., DEVRIENDT J., et al.
2011ApJ...736...51E 10199 T   A S   X C       261 21 49 The
Sloan Great Wall. Morphology and galaxy content. 		EINASTO M., LIIVAMAEGI L.J., TEMPEL E., et al.
2011ApJ...736...59Z 759           X C       12 1 512 Galaxy clustering in the completed SDSS redshift survey: the dependence on color and luminosity. ZEHAVI I., ZHENG Z., WEINBERG D.H., et al.
2011MNRAS.415..964L 542           X C       13 17 23 Future virialized structures: an analysis of superstructures in the SDSS-DR7. LUPARELLO H., LARES M., LAMBAS D.G., et al.
2011A&A...531A..75E 233           X         6 8 19 Wavelet analysis of the cosmic web formation. EINASTO J., HUETSI G., SAAR E., et al.
2011A&A...532A...5E 5262     A D     X C       136 103 40 SDSS DR7 superclusters. Morphology. EINASTO M., LIIVAMAEGI L.J., TAGO E., et al.
2009RAA.....9..979M 154           X C       3 1 3 Clustering of K-band selected local galaxies. MA B., MENG K.-L., PAN J., et al.
2011A&A...531A.149S 194           X C       4 8 23 The cosmic web for density perturbations of various scales. SUHHONENKO I., EINASTO J., LIIVAMAEGI L.J., et al.
2011AJ....142..133G 272           X         7 7 15 Mapping the universe: the 2010 Russell lecture. GELLER M.J., DIAFERIO A. and KURTZ M.J.
2011ApJ...741...19M 82             C       3 1 10 How accurate is our knowledge of the galaxy bias? MORE S.
2011RAA....11..655M 1 1 On the fairness of the main galaxy sample of SDSS. MENG K.-L., MA B. and FENG L.-L.
2011MNRAS.417.1303M 43           X         1 2 18 Halo-based reconstruction of the cosmic mass density field. MUNOZ-CUARTAS J.C., MUELLER V. and FORERO-ROMERO J.E.
2010Ap.....53..396R 79           X         2 1 5 Inhomogeneities in the spatial distribution of gamma-ray bursts. RAIKOV A.A., ORLOV V.V. and BEKETOV O.B.
2011MNRAS.417.2938S 2170 T   A D S   X C F     53 5 38 How unusual are the Shapley supercluster and the Sloan great wall? SHETH R.K. and DIAFERIO A.
2011A&A...535A..36E 271           X C       6 35 11 SDSS DR7 superclusters. Principal component analysis. EINASTO M., LIIVAMAEGI L.J., SAAR E., et al.
2011MNRAS.418.2435N 164           X         4 1 19 Statistical analysis of galaxy surveys – IV. An objective way to quantify the impact of superstructures on galaxy clustering statistics. NORBERG P., GAZTANAGA E., BAUGH C.M., et al.
2012MNRAS.419..556C 39           X         1 77 24 Two close large quasar groups of size ∼ 350 mpc at z ∼ 1.2. CLOWES R.G., CAMPUSANO L.E., GRAHAM M.J., et al.
2012MNRAS.419.2670M 99           X         1 1 121 Measures of galaxy environment - I. What is `environment'? MULDREW S.I., CROTON D.J., SKIBBA R.A., et al.
2012ApJ...745..177H 39           X         1 10 7 Deep ultraviolet luminosity functions at the infall region of the Coma cluster. HAMMER D.M., HORNSCHEMEIER A.E., SALIM S., et al.
2012ApJ...746....1K 129           X         3 2 48 The spatial clustering of ROSAT all-sky survey active galactic nuclei. III. Expanded sample and comparison with optical active galactic nuclei. KRUMPE M., MIYAJI T., COIL A.L., et al.
2012MNRAS.420.1809W 555     A     X C F     12 1 50 Reconstructing the cosmic velocity and tidal fields with galaxy groups selected from the Sloan digital sky survey. WANG H., MO H.J., YANG X., et al.
2012A&A...539A..80L viz 285           X C       6 3 77 SDSS DR7 superclusters. The catalogues. LIIVAMAEGI L.J., TEMPEL E. and SAAR E.
2012A&A...540A.123E viz 117           X         3 32 43 Multimodality in galaxy clusters from SDSS DR8: substructure and velocity distribution. EINASTO M., VENNIK J., NURMI P., et al.
2012MNRAS.423.1485S 74           X         1 1 70 Galaxy zoo: the environmental dependence of bars and bulges in disc galaxies. SKIBBA R.A., MASTERS K.L., NICHOL R.C., et al.
2012A&A...542A..36E viz 585           X C       14 158 35 Multimodality of rich clusters from the SDSS DR8 within the supercluster-void network. EINASTO M., LIIVAMAEGI L.J., TEMPEL E., et al.
2012ApJ...754..131K 79           X         2 7 22 Testing for a large local void by investigating the near-infrared galaxy luminosity function. KEENAN R.C., BARGER A.J., COWIE L.L., et al.
2012MNRAS.425..116S 130           X         2 1 105 The WiggleZ dark energy survey: the transition to large-scale cosmic homogeneity. SCRIMGEOUR M.I., DAVIS T., BLAKE C., et al.
2012MNRAS.425.1527C 49           X         1 1 20 Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): colour- and luminosity-dependent clustering from calibrated photometric redshifts. CHRISTODOULOU L., EMINIAN C., LOVEDAY J., et al.
2012ApJ...759L...7P 1167     A     X C       29 2 52 The challenge of the largest structures in the universe to cosmology. PARK C., CHOI Y.-Y., KIM J., et al.
2013AJ....145...53D 118           X         3 4 0 A comparison of the clustering properties between galaxies and groups of galaxies. DENG X.-F.
2013MNRAS.428..906C 43           X         1 1 8 Stellar populations in superclusters of galaxies. COSTA-DUARTE M.V., SODRE L.Jr and DURRET F.
2013MNRAS.428.2548K 402           X C       9 1 19 Halo occupation distribution modelling of green valley galaxies. KRAUSE E., HIRATA C.M., MARTIN C., et al.
2013MNRAS.429.2910C 669           X         17 78 71 A structure in the early universe at z ∼ 1.3 that exceeds the homogeneity scale of the R-W concordance cosmology. CLOWES R.G., HARRIS K.A., RAGHUNATHAN S., et al.
2013MNRAS.430..767C 89           X         1 1 100 Cosmological constraints from a combination of galaxy clustering and lensing - III. Application to SDSS data. CACCIATO M., VAN DEN BOSCH F.C., MORE S., et al.
2013ApJ...767...50M 24 6 291 PRIMUS: constraints on star formation quenching and galaxy merging, and the evolution of the stellar mass function from z = 0-1. MOUSTAKAS J., COIL A.L., AIRD J., et al.
2013ApJ...775...62K 343           X C       7 1 57 Evidence for a ∼300 megaparsec scale under-density in the local galaxy distribution. KEENAN R.C., BARGER A.J. and COWIE L.L.
2013MNRAS.434..398N 205           X         5 2 34 Seeing patterns in noise: gigaparsec-scale `structures' that do not violate homogeneity. NADATHUR S.
2013MNRAS.434..784R 48           X         1 1 18 SPIDER - IX. Classifying galaxy groups according to their velocity distribution. RIBEIRO A.L.B., DE CARVALHO R.R., TREVISAN M., et al.
2013A&A...557A..21S 279           X C       6 2 17 Calibrating the fundamental plane with SDSS DR8 data. SAULDER C., MIESKE S., ZEILINGER W.W., et al.
2013A&A...557A..39S 39           X         1 8 0 What X-ray source counts can tell about large-scale matter distribution. SOLTAN A.M. and CHODOROWSKI M.J.
2013A&A...560A..90F 159           X C       3 12 54 Measuring cosmic bulk flows with Type Ia supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory. FEINDT U., KERSCHHAGGL M., KOWALSKI M., et al.
2014MNRAS.437.3883G viz 44           X         1 1 8 Non-parametric cell-based photometric proxies for galaxy morphology: methodology and application to the morphologically defined star formation-stellar mass relation of spiral galaxies in the local universe. GROOTES M.W., TUFFS R.J., POPESCU C.C., et al.
2014A&A...561L..12H 149     A     X         4 2 25 Possible structure in the GRB sky distribution at redshift two. HORVATH I., HAKKILA J. and BAGOLY Z.
2014A&A...562A..87E 278           X C       6 55 36 SDSS superclusters: morphology and galaxy content. EINASTO M., LIETZEN H., TEMPEL E., et al.
2014ApJ...784..128S 126           X         3 3 42 PRIMUS: galaxy clustering as a function of luminosity and color at 0.2 < z < 1. SKIBBA R.A., SMITH M.S.M., COIL A.L., et al.
2014MNRAS.441.1783A 3 4 25 The ALHAMBRA survey: evolution of galaxy clustering since z ∼ 1. ARNALTE-MUR P., MARTINEZ V.J., NORBERG P., et al.
2014MNRAS.441.2923C 91           X         1 1 103 Evolution of the cosmic web. CAUTUN M., VAN DE WEYGAERT R., JONES B.J.T., et al.
2014A&A...568A..46E viz 127           X         3 1 17 Tracing a high redshift cosmic web with quasar systems. EINASTO M., TAGO E., LIETZEN H., et al.
2014ApJ...795..157K 42           X         1 3 17 Evolution of the major merger galaxy pair fraction at z < 1. KEENAN R.C., FOUCAUD S., DE PROPRIS R., et al.
2014ApJ...796...86P 82           X         2 1 7 A topological analysis of large-scale structure, studied using the CMASS sample of SDSS-III. PARIHAR P., VOGELEY M.S., GOTT III J.R., et al.
2014MNRAS.445.4073C viz 159           X         4 26 12 Two new catalogues of superclusters of Abell/ACO galaxy clusters out to redshift 0.15. CHOW-MARTINEZ M., ANDERNACH H., CARETTA C.A., et al.
2015ApJ...799...95W viz 165           X C       3 2 9 Structure in the 3D galaxy distribution. II. Voids and watersheds of local maxima and minima. WAY M.J., GAZIS P.R. and SCARGLE J.D.
2015ApJ...799..130R 64           X         1 2 49 The stellar-to-halo mass relation of local galaxies segregates by color. RODRIGUEZ-PUEBLA A., AVILA-REESE V., YANG X., et al.
2015A&A...574A..26B 45           X         1 3 17 The extended ROSAT-ESO Flux-Limited X-ray Galaxy Cluster Survey (REFLEX II). V. Exploring a local underdensity in the southern sky. BOEHRINGER H., CHON G., BRISTOW M., et al.
2015MNRAS.448.1483L 281           X C       6 11 4 Brightest group galaxies and the large-scale environment. LUPARELLO H.E., LARES M., PAZ D., et al.
2015MNRAS.449.3212P 40           X         1 12 4 The extent of gravitationally bound structure in a ΛCDM universe. PEARSON D.W.
2015A&A...580A..69E 281           X C       6 25 16 Unusual A2142 supercluster with a collapsing core: distribution of light and mass. EINASTO M., GRAMANN M., SAAR E., et al.
2015MNRAS.451..486R 40           X         1 5 3 Lagrangian volume deformations around simulated galaxies. ROBLES S., DOMINGUEZ-TENREIRO R., ONORBE J., et al.
2015A&A...581A.135G 40           X         1 9 8 Characteristic density contrasts in the evolution of superclusters. The case of A2142 supercluster. GRAMANN M., EINASTO M., HEINAEMAEKI P., et al.
2015A&A...582A.111L viz 80           X         2 324 8 Testing the homogeneity of the Universe using gamma-ray bursts. LI M.-H. and LIN H.-N.
2015MNRAS.452.2236B 81           X         2 12 23 A giant ring-like structure at 0.78 < z < 0.86 displayed by GRBs. BALAZS L.G., BAGOLY Z., HAKKILA J.E., et al.
2015A&A...584A..48H viz 64     A     X         2 359 14 New data support the existence of the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall. HORVATH I., BAGOLY Z., HAKKILA J., et al.
2016MNRAS.455.2804S 43           X         1 3 7 Star formation and gas phase history of the cosmic web. SNEDDEN A., COUGHLIN J., PHILLIPS L.A., et al.
2016MNRAS.455.3169L 148     A     X         4 7 20 Unmasking the masked Universe: the 2M++ catalogue through Bayesian eyes. LAVAUX G. and JASCHE J.
2016ApJ...818..173H 127           X         3 2 10 HectoMAP and horizon run 4: dense structures and voids in the real and simulated universe. HWANG H.S., GELLER M.J., PARK C., et al.
2016ApJ...821...55M 45           X         1 7 31 PRIMUS + DEEP2: clustering of X-ray, radio, and IR-AGNs at z∼0.7.. MENDEZ A.J., COIL A.L., AIRD J., et al.
2016ApJ...821..110P 44           X         1 1 3 A new statistical perspective on the cosmic void distribution. PYCKE J.-R. and RUSSELL E.
2016A&A...588L...4L 352     A     X         9 3 11 Discovery of a massive supercluster system at z ∼ 0.47. LIETZEN H., TEMPEL E., LIIVAMAGI L.J., et al.
2016ApJ...823..103H 26       D               1 1 10 The most bound halo particle-galaxy correspondence model: comparison between models with different merger timescales. HONG S.E., PARK C. and KIM J.
2016MNRAS.457.3285M 86             C       1 2 10 Defining the frame of minimum non-linear Hubble expansion variation. McKAY J.H. and WILTSHIRE D.L.
2016ARep...60..563S 41           X         1 3 2 Large-scale fluctuations in the number density of galaxies in independent surveys of deep fields. SHIROKOV S.I., LOVYAGIN N.Y., BARYSHEV Y.V., et al.
2016MNRAS.460..163R 49           X         1 3 25 Exploring the SDSS photometric galaxies with clustering redshifts. RAHMAN M., MENDEZ A.J., MENARD B., et al.
2016MNRAS.461.2267M 123           X         3 2 2 Compatibility of the large quasar groups with the concordance cosmological model. MARINELLO G.E., CLOWES R.G., CAMPUSANO L.E., et al.
2016MNRAS.462.1882K 472 T   A     X C       10 14 18 Cosmic troublemakers: the Cold Spot, the Eridanus supervoid, and the Great Walls. KOVACS A. and GARCIA-BELLIDO J.
2016ApJ...831..164W 904           X C       21 2 23 ELUCID - exploring the local universe with reconstructed initial density field III: constrained simulation in the SDSS volume. WANG H., MO H.J., YANG X., et al.
2016ApJ...833..241S 438     A     X C       10 1 8 Mapping the real-space distributions of galaxies in SDSS DR7. I. Two-point correlation functions. SHI F., YANG X., WANG H., et al.
2016A&A...595A..70E 146 T   A     X         3 26 9
Sloan Great Wall as a complex of superclusters with collapsing cores. 		EINASTO M., LIETZEN H., GRAMANN M., et al.
2017ApJ...835...56C 83             C       1 3 4 Star formation and supercluster environment of 107 nearby galaxy clusters. COHEN S.A., HICKOX R.C., WEGNER G.A., et al.
2017MNRAS.465.1358P 330           X C       7 5 6 On the influence of the environment on galactic chemical abundances. PILYUGIN L.S., GREBEL E.K., ZINCHENKO I.A., et al.
2017MNRAS.464..768B 45           X         1 3 13 Is there evidence for anomalous dipole anisotropy in the large-scale structure? BENGALY C.A.P., BERNUI A., ALCANIZ J.S., et al.
2016MNRAS.463.4083A 43           X         1 1 2 Cosmology with peculiar velocities: observational effects. ANDERSEN P., DAVIS T.M. and HOWLETT C.
2017MNRAS.467.3951M 41           X         1 8 2 Imaging of diffuse H I absorption structure in the SSA22 protocluster region at z = 3.1. MAWATARI K., INOUE A.K., YAMADA T., et al.
2017ApJ...844...25B 82           X         2 7 2 Saraswati: an extremely massive ∼200 megaparsec scale supercluster. BAGCHI J., SANKHYAYAN S., SARKAR P., et al.
2017A&A...603A...5E 41           X         1 11 2 BOSS Great Wall: morphology, luminosity, and mass. EINASTO M., LIETZEN H., GRAMANN M., et al.
2017MNRAS.469.1924P 45           X         1 1 4 The cosmological principle is not in the sky. PARK C.-G., HYUN H., NOH H., et al.
2017ApJ...851...15R 43           X         1 2 5 Testing the isotropic universe using the gamma-ray burst data of Fermi/GBM. RIPA J. and SHAFIELOO A.
2017MNRAS.472.4819T 83             C       1 3 5 Testing the anisotropy in the angular distribution of Fermi/GBM gamma-ray bursts. TARNOPOLSKI M.
2018MNRAS.473.1195L 45           X         1 8 28 Tracing the cosmic web. LIBESKIND N.I., VAN DE WEYGAERT R., CAUTUN M., et al.
2018A&A...610A..82E 42           X         1 20 3 Infalling groups and galaxy transformations in the cluster A2142. EINASTO M., DESHEV B., LIETZEN H., et al.
2018MNRAS.476.1050B 43           X         1 2 2 Extracting cosmological information from the angular power spectrum of the 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue. BALAGUERA-ANTOLINEZ A., BILICKI M., BRANCHINI E., et al.
2018MNRAS.473.2830L 49           X         1 1 7 Brightest galaxies as halo centre tracers in SDSS DR7. LANGE J.U., VAN DEN BOSCH F.C., HEARIN A., et al.
2018ApJ...860..127L 42           X         1 5 2 Linear tidal vestige found in the WM sheet. LEE J., KIM S. and REY S.-C.
2018ApJ...866...45L 43           X         1 3 3 The 2.4 µm galaxy luminosity function as measured using WISE. III. Measurement results. LAKE S.E., WRIGHT E.L., ASSEF R.J., et al.
2018MNRAS.480.4017L 125           X C       2 1 ~ Exploring the thermal energy contents of the intergalactic mediumwith the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect. LIM S.H., MO H.J., WANG H., et al.
2018A&A...619A..49C 42           X         1 5 ~ The progeny of a cosmic titan: a massive multi-component proto-supercluster in formation at z=2.45 in VUDS. CUCCIATI O., LEMAUX B.C., ZAMORANI G., et al.
2018MNRAS.481.5470X 42           X         1 1 ~ The conditional colour-magnitude distribution - I. A comprehensive model of the colour-magnitude-halo mass distribution of present-day galaxies. XU H., ZHENG Z., GUO H., et al.
2018A&A...620A.149E 84           X         2 8 ~ Supercluster A2142 and collapse in action: infalling and merging groups and galaxy transformations. EINASTO M., GRAMANN M., PARK C., et al.
2019MNRAS.483.2453S 43           X         1 3 ~ Testing isotropy in the Universe using photometric and spectroscopic data from the SDSS. SARKAR S., PANDEY B. and KHATRI R.
2019ApJ...872..180C 128           X         3 3 ~ ELUCID. VI. Cosmic variance of the galaxy distribution in the local universe. CHEN Y., MO H.J., LI C., et al.
2019A&A...623A..97E 43           X         1 10 ~ Evolution of superclusters in the cosmic web. EINASTO J., SUHHONENKO I., LIIVAMAGI L.J., et al.
2019MNRAS.485.1196Z 43           X         1 1 ~ Constraints on assembly bias from galaxy clustering. ZENTNER A.R., HEARIN A., VAN DEN BOSCH F.C., et al.
2019MNRAS.485.4743S 43           X         1 3 ~ Unravelling the cosmic web: an analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 14 with the local dimension. SARKAR S. and PANDEY B.
2019MNRAS.488.1220P 85             C       1 1 ~ Global analysis of luminosity- and colour-dependent galaxy clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. PAUL N., PAHWA I. and PARANJAPE A.
2019MNRAS.489.4912S 170           X C       3 5 ~ Screening maps of the local Universe I - Methodology. SHAO S., LI B., CAUTUN M., et al.
2020MNRAS.495.4291C 44           X         1 2 ~ Re-examining the evidence of the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall. CHRISTIAN S.
2020ApJ...897...17T 44           X         1 1 ~ Cosmological information from the small-scale redshift-space distortion. TONEGAWA M., PARK C., ZHENG Y., et al.
2020ApJ...897..133P 287     A     X C       6 15 ~ Cosmicflows-3: the South Pole Wall. POMAREDE D., TULLY R.B., GRAZIANI R., et al.
2020MNRAS.498.2544H 44           X         1 3 ~ The clustering of gamma-ray bursts in the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall: the largest structure in the Universe? HORVATH I., SZECSI D., HAKKILA J., et al.
2020A&A...641A.172E 44           X         1 16 ~ Multiscale cosmic web detachments, connectivity, and preprocessing in the supercluster SCl A2142 cocoon. EINASTO M., DESHEV B., TENJES P., et al.
2021MNRAS.502.5495D 45           X         1 1 ~ Counts-in-cells of subhaloes in the IllustrisTNG simulations: the role of baryonic physics. DANTAS C.C.
2021A&A...649A..51E 493           X         11 17 ~ The Corona Borealis supercluster: connectivity, collapse, and evolution. EINASTO M., KIPPER R., TENJES P., et al.
2021MNRAS.507.5425S 45           X         1 21 ~ Quantifying the rarity of the local super-volume. STOPYRA S., PEIRIS H.V., PONTZEN A., et al.
2022MNRAS.510.2228D 93           X         2 12 ~ The Zwicky Transient Facility Type Ia supernova survey: first data release and results. DHAWAN S., GOOBAR A., SMITH M., et al.
2022A&A...660A.139K 93           X         2 1 ~ CMASS galaxy sample and the ontological status of the cosmological principle. KIM Y., PARK C.-G., NOH H., et al.
2022MNRAS.513.2509C 47           X         1 40 ~ Tracing Milky Way substructure with an RR Lyrae hierarchical clustering forest. COOK B.T., WOODS D.F., RUPRECHT J.D., et al.
2022NatAs...6..857A 47           X         1 10 ~ Predicted future fate of COSMOS galaxy protoclusters over 11 Gyr with constrained simulations. ATA M., LEE K.-G., DALLA VECCHIA C., et al.
2022ApJ...936...11L 541     A S   X C       10 3 ~ ELUCID. VII. Using Constrained Hydro Simulations to Explore the Gas Component of the Cosmic Web. LI R., WANG H., MO H.J., et al.
2022MNRAS.516.1557L 93     A D     X         3 11 ~ A Giant Arc on the Sky. LOPEZ A.M., CLOWES R.G. and WILLIGER G.M.
2022A&A...666A..52E 47           X         1 12 ~ The evolution of high-density cores of the BOSS Great Wall superclusters. EINASTO M., TENJES P., GRAMANN M., et al.
2022A&A...668A..37H 93           X         2 22 ~ Quasi-spherical superclusters. HEINAMAKI P., TEERIKORPI P., DOUSPIS M., et al.
2022A&A...668A..69E 140           X C       2 10 ~ Death at watersheds: Galaxy quenching in low-density environments. EINASTO M., KIPPER R., TENJES P., et al.
2023ApJ...944...75M 50           X         1 10 ~ Galaxy Populations in Groups and Clusters: Evidence for a Characteristic Stellar Mass Scale at M∗ ∼ 109.5M⊙. MENG J., LI C., MO H.J., et al.
2023ApJ...944...94T 50           X         1 25 ~ Cosmicflows-4. TULLY R.B., KOURKCHI E., COURTOIS H.M., et al.
2023A&A...670L..15C 250           X C       4 5 ~ Gravity in the local Universe: Density and velocity fields using CosmicFlows-4. COURTOIS H.M., DUPUY A., GUINET D., et al.

goto View the references in ADSLimited to 100

2023.03.27-11:53:56

© Université de Strasbourg/CNRS

    • Contact